🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."